Mayor Marty Walsh held a rally at Boston City Hall Plaza on Sunday in support of transgender rights.

A group of people turned out to share their views on question three, a referendum that would repeal a 2016 law that prohibits discrimination in public accommodations on the basis of gender identity.

Walsh said, “The fact that we are having this battle on the ballot is wrong. Love trumps hate.”

Proponents of the question hope to keep the existing law in place.

Opponents say state law is too vague when it comes to the definition of gender. They fear that criminals and sex offenders will be able to take advantage of these ambiguities and pose a safety risk to the public.

“This question is about equality in legislature,” Walsh said.

Young Roman Catholics attending an important Vatican meeting this month are demanding that bishops do more to make LGBTQ Catholics feel more welcomed ― while adhering to the global church’s conservative doctrine on sexuality.

The insistence on inclusion is coming from several young leaders chosen by the church to audit the Synod of Bishops, an annual Vatican assembly that advises the pope. The monthlong bishops’ conference, which began on Oct. 3, is days away from voting on a final document that has the potential to become official church teaching.

The young people told reporters during a Vatican press conference Friday that they’re hoping the final document includes language that clearly reaches out to LGBTQ Catholics and emphasizes a more loving, pastoral approach.

Yadira Vieyra, a 29-year-old auditor from Chicago, said that people in her English-language small group at the synod, one of 14 groups working with bishops on the final document, have been talking about how the church can minister to LGBTQ Catholics who often feel “attacked.”

“Oftentimes when ministered to in a poor manner, they feel like they are displaced and that the church doesn’t want them. We know that’s not true. Any Catholic knows that that is not true,” Vieyra said, according to the Catholic News Service (CNS).

Some of the small groups at the synod called for a specific section in the final document about the topic of sexuality. Each paragraph of the document must be approved by a two-thirds majority of bishops in order to be added to the final version, The Associated Press reports

Some bishops have already expressed resistance to the idea of reaching out to LGBTQ Catholics in this way, AP reports.

Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput said that “there is no such thing as an ‘LGBTQ Catholic’ or a ‘transgender Catholic’ or a ‘heterosexual Catholic,’ as if our sexual appetites defined who we are,” the AP reports.

The welcome young Catholic leaders at the synod are demanding for LGBTQ Catholics does have a limit, however. Although they are calling for a more loving approach, the groups ultimately affirmed long-held church doctrine that considers queer relationships to be “intrinsically disordered.” 

“No one, on account of gender, lifestyle or sexual orientation, should ever be made to feel unloved, uncared for,” an English-language working group stated in a reflection published on Saturday, according to CNS. “However, as St. Thomas Aquinas specifies, love means ‘willing the good of the other.’ And this is why authentic love by no means excludes the call to conversion, to change of life.”

However — in America, at least — their views may not represent those of young Catholics as a whole. 

Most American Catholics between the ages of 18 and 29 believe it’s completely acceptable for a same-sex couple in a romantic relationship to be living together (63 percent), according to a 2015 survey from the Pew Research Center. Older generations are much less accepting of these relationships. 

In 2014, Pew found that the overwhelming majority of millennial Catholics believed gays and lesbians should be accepted by society (85 percent) and supported same-sex marriage (75 percent). 

Francis DeBernardo, executive director of the queer Catholic advocacy group New Ways Ministry, doesn’t believe the synod has been engaging with issues concerning LGBTQ Catholics in a meaningful way. In a blog, he wrote that for many of the synod attendees, there’s an underlying assumption that “welcoming” LGBTQ Catholics also means inviting them to change who they are, or agree to a life a celibacy.

“While it is very good that [bishops] are stressing a welcoming and accompanying approach to LGBT ministry, the prelates seem to downplay any controversial element of ministry to LGBT people,” wrote DeBernardo, who attended a Vatican press briefing on Saturday. “They speak in generalities and do not recognize the unique needs and gifts that LGBT people bring to the church.”

“While a welcoming approach is good and needed, it cannot be the last word,” he added.

 As young leaders chosen for the active roles they play in the church’s ministry, it’s unsurprising that the lay auditors are seeking to adhere to Catholic doctrine on sexuality.

The Human Rights Campaign on Sunday called for the Trump administration not to go forward with a rollback of protections for transgender people, following a report in The New York Times on a draft proposal.

"Setting a destructive precedent, the Trump-Pence administration intends to erase LGBTQ people from federal civil rights protections and eviscerate enforcement of non-discrimination laws," the group's president, Chad Griffin, said in a statement.
HRC is among the nation's most prominent LGBTQ rights groups, and its statement Sunday called on Congress to pass legislation enshrining protections it says are at threat should the Trump administration go forward with the reported plan.
 
The Times report said the Department of Health and Human Services is working to define sex under Title IX as solely male or female at birth, with no room for change. The proposal could formally be presented to the Justice Department by the end of the year, sources told the Times.
"Sex means a person's status as male or female based on immutable biological traits identifiable by or before birth," the proposal says, according to The Times.
The move, if made and followed through in coordination with other key federal departments, would mark a major shift for transgender rights under the law and reverse course from the Obama administration, which expanded the legal concept of gender in several instances to recognize gender identity did not always match one's sex as determined at birth.
 
Vanita Gupta, head of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, said in a statement on Sunday that the proposal "defies the medical community, science, civil rights laws, the courts and the dictates of human decency."
Gupta worked in the Justice Department's civil rights division during the Obama administration, and in her statement, said civil rights groups would use "every tool" they could to counter the reported Trump administration move.
The report published Sunday said the new definition, if adopted, would erase federal recognition for the many Americans who identify as a gender different than the one they were identified with at birth. It also said the move would be relevant in particular to a pair of proposed rules, one from the Education Department on sex discrimination at schools and colleges and another at HHS on health programs that receive federal funding.
HHS spokesperson Caitlin Oakley declined to comment to CNN "on alleged leaked documents," and a statement from Roger Severino, the head of HHS' office of civil rights, said HHS was following a court order blocking a rule on gender identity.
 
"A federal court has blocked HHS's rule on gender identity and termination of pregnancy as contrary to law and infringing the rights of healthcare providers across the country," Severino's statement said. "The court order remains in full force and effect today and HHS is abiding by it as we continue to review the issue."
The Times report said HHS has argued privately that sex should not include gender identity "or even homosexuality," and that the Obama administration was wrong to extend civil rights protections. It said additionally that HHS officials were looking to a 2016 federal court ruling on a provision of Obamacare, where Judge Reed O'Connor said, "Congress did not understand 'sex' to include 'gender identity.'"
The draft proposal would be one of the latest attempts to push back against Obama administration policies on gender identity and LGBT rights, much of which has come in contrast to President Donald Trump's pledge during his 2016 presidential campaign to be an ally to the LGBT community.
HRC described the news Sunday as "the latest effort in a consistent, multi-pronged campaign by the Trump-Pence White House over the past two years to undermine the rights and welfare of LGBTQ people."
"Defining 'sex' in this narrow language tailored to the talking points of anti-equality extremists is part of a deliberate strategy to eliminate federal protections for LGBTQ people," Griffin said.

LGBTQ groups on Sunday announced rallies and demonstrations in response to a recent New York Times report that indicated the Trump administration is planning to exclude transgender and nonbinary people from its legal definition of gender.

The National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE), Lambda Legal, Human Rights Campaign and other LGBTQ advocacy groups are organizing demonstrations to take place in New York City on Sunday evening and in Washington, D.C., on Monday morning. 

Lambda Legal and LGBTQ advocacy group Voices 4 are set to hold a demonstration in New York City's Washington Square Park from 6-7:30 p.m., while the NCTE and Human Rights Campaign are organizing a rally to take place in front of the White House at 12:30 p.m. on Monday. 

The Washington, D.C., demonstration will take place after an 11 a.m. press conference by advocacy organizations hosted at the Human Rights Campaign's building. The organizations are still finalizing the roster of speakers. 

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said it doesn't comment on alleged leak documents. 

“A federal court has blocked HHS’s rule on gender identity and termination of pregnancy as contrary to law and infringing the rights of healthcare providers across the country," Roger Severino, the head of the office of civil rights at the agency, said in a statement to The Hill. "The court order remains in full force and effect today and HHS is abiding by it as we continue to review the issue.”

The White House did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment.

Trans and LGBTQ advocacy organizations have responded to the report with unequivocal denunciations throughout the day, saying a definition of gender that relies solely on biology would result in discrimination against trans and nonbinary individuals. 

"This proposal is an attempt to put heartless restraints on the lives of 2 million people, effectively abandoning our right to equal access to health care, to housing, to education, or to fair treatment under the law," the NCTE wrote in a press release on Sunday.

"This administration is willing to disregard the established medical and legal view of our rights and ourselves to solidify an archaic, dogmatic, and frightening view of the world," the organization added. "This transparent political attack will not succeed administratively, legally, or morally."

The groups are mobilizing in response to a Times report that found the Trump administration has proposed a legal definition of gender as determined "on a biological basis that is clear, grounded in science, objective and administrable."

The proposal would reportedly require DNA testing to resolve any disputes about a person's gender.

This could mean the millions of people who identify as transgender, or with a gender other than the one they are assigned at birth, would not be recognized as a legitimate group by the government. They would be excluded from civil rights protections under Title IX, the civil rights law that bans gender discrimination in educational settings.

The Obama administration adopted a definition of gender that recognized peoples' self-definitions of their identities. The proposed definition would roll back the former president's attempts to expand civil rights for transgender people. 

NCTE and Lambda Legal throughout Sunday promoted the hashtag #WontBeErased, encouraging transgender and gender nonconforming people to post photos of themselves in order to show that "transgender people can't be erased with a memo," NCTE wrote in a tweet.Lamba Legal's demonstration in Washington Square Park on Sunday will involve multiple high-profile speakers, including actress and advocate Sara Ramirez and American Civil Liberties Union attorney Chase Strangio.

"It’s deeply concerning that our federal government has chosen to disregard decades of existing law to push forward what are clearly ideologically-driven policy views about who transgender people are," Lambda Legal senior attorney Sasha Buchert told The Hill. 

"We've built protections in employment, education and healthcare for the past 25 years," Buchert added. "It’s completely out of step with the law ... It’s out of step with the medical consensus."

Buchert said Lambda Legal will be meeting with the Department of Education's civil rights office on Monday in a previously-planned meeting to discuss the ramifications for transgender students. 

"We’ll consider all options as soon as this rule is formulated and put forward," Buchert said, noting HHS has not made the proposal public yet. "It doesn’t change the law." 

Buy It Now!